Section 1: Number of private schemes
Figure 1.1 Table 1: Distribution of schemes by status
Status | Number of schemes | Percentage of total |
---|---|---|
A: Open | 180 | 4% |
B: CTNM | 990 | 19% |
C: CTFA | 3,790 | 73% |
D: Winding Up | 230 | 4% |
Total | 5,190 | 100% |
Figure 1.2 Table 1: Distribution of schemes by status and year, total values
Year | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | 830 | 2,680 | 2,990 | 800 | 7,300 |
2013 | 780 | 2,390 | 3,200 | 610 | 6,980 |
2014 | 700 | 2,210 | 3,300 | 440 | 6,650 |
2015 | 460 | 2,220 | 3,340 | 380 | 6,400 |
2016 | 420 | 2,030 | 3,430 | 320 | 6,200 |
2017 | 340 | 1,900 | 3,480 | 250 | 5,970 |
2018 | 310 | 1,700 | 3,590 | 210 | 5,810 |
2019 | 280 | 1,560 | 3,660 | 200 | 5,700 |
2020 | 250 | 1,430 | 3,730 | 190 | 5,600 |
2021 | 230 | 1,310 | 3,770 | 210 | 5,520 |
2022 | 210 | 1,200 | 3,760 | 200 | 5,370 |
2023 | 200 | 1,080 | 3,790 | 220 | 5,290 |
2024 | 180 | 990 | 3,790 | 230 | 5,190 |
Figure 1.2 Table 2: Distribution of schemes by status and year, yearly percentage
Year | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | 11% | 37% | 41% | 11% | 100% |
2013 | 11% | 34% | 46% | 9% | 100% |
2014 | 11% | 33% | 50% | 7% | 100% |
2015 | 7% | 35% | 52% | 6% | 100% |
2016 | 7% | 33% | 55% | 5% | 100% |
2017 | 6% | 32% | 58% | 4% | 100% |
2018 | 5% | 29% | 62% | 4% | 100% |
2019 | 5% | 27% | 64% | 3% | 100% |
2020 | 5% | 25% | 67% | 3% | 100% |
2021 | 4% | 24% | 68% | 4% | 100% |
2022 | 4% | 22% | 70% | 4% | 100% |
2023 | 4% | 20% | 72% | 4% | 100% |
2024 | 4% | 19% | 73% | 4% | 100% |
Figure 1.3 Table 1: Distribution of schemes by status and year excluding hybrid schemes, total values
Year | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | 750 | 2,090 | 2,170 | 670 | 5,680 |
2013 | 700 | 1,880 | 2,380 | 500 | 5,460 |
2014 | 630 | 1,780 | 2,520 | 360 | 5,290 |
2015 | 390 | 1,820 | 2,540 | 310 | 5,060 |
2016 | 360 | 1,690 | 2,690 | 270 | 5,010 |
2017 | 290 | 1,610 | 2,740 | 220 | 4,860 |
2018 | 260 | 1,440 | 2,830 | 180 | 4,710 |
2019 | 230 | 1,340 | 2,980 | 180 | 4,730 |
2020 | 210 | 1,240 | 3,060 | 170 | 4,680 |
2021 | 200 | 1,140 | 3,100 | 190 | 4,630 |
2022 | 190 | 1,040 | 3,130 | 180 | 4,540 |
2023 | 180 | 930 | 3,160 | 210 | 4,480 |
2024 | 170 | 850 | 3,190 | 200 | 4,410 |
Figure 1.3 Table 2: Distribution of schemes by status and year excluding hybrid schemes, yearly percentage
Year | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | 13% | 37% | 38% | 12% | 100% |
2013 | 13% | 34% | 44% | 9% | 100% |
2014 | 12% | 34% | 48% | 7% | 100% |
2015 | 8% | 36% | 50% | 6% | 100% |
2016 | 7% | 34% | 54% | 5% | 100% |
2017 | 6% | 33% | 56% | 5% | 100% |
2018 | 5% | 31% | 60% | 4% | 100% |
2019 | 5% | 28% | 63% | 4% | 100% |
2020 | 5% | 26% | 65% | 4% | 100% |
2021 | 4% | 25% | 67% | 4% | 100% |
2022 | 4% | 23% | 69% | 4% | 100% |
2023 | 4% | 21% | 71% | 5% | 100% |
2024 | 4% | 19% | 72% | 5% | 100% |
Figure 1.4 Table 1: Distribution of schemes by status and membership group, total values
Membership group | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A: 2 to 99 | 40 | 350 | 1,460 | 150 | 2,000 |
B: 100 to 999 | 70 | 420 | 1,650 | 60 | 2,200 |
C: 1,000 to 4,999 | 40 | 130 | 490 | 10 | 670 |
D: 5,000 to 9,999 | 20 | 50 | 90 | 10 | 170 |
E: 10,000 + | 20 | 50 | 100 | 0 | 170 |
Figure 1.4 Table 2: Distribution of schemes by status and membership group, yearly percentage
Membership group | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A: 2 to 99 | 2% | 17% | 73% | 7% | 100% |
B: 100 to 999 | 3% | 19% | 75% | 3% | 100% |
C: 1,000 to 4,999 | 6% | 20% | 72% | 2% | 100% |
D: 5,000 to 9,999 | 10% | 31% | 55% | 4% | 100% |
E: 10,000 + | 9% | 30% | 59% | 2% | 100% |
Section 2: Memberships of private schemes
Figure 2.1 Table 1: Distribution of memberships by status
Status | Number of memberships | Percentage of memberships |
---|---|---|
A: Open | 1,119,000 | 12% |
B: CTNM | 2,513,000 | 27% |
C: CTFA | 5,656,000 | 60% |
D: Winding Up | 136,000 | 1% |
Total | 9,424,000 | 100% |
Figure 2.2 Table 1: Distribution of memberships by status and year, total values
Year | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding Up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | 2,785,000 | 6,505,000 | 3,309,000 | 210,000 | 12,809,000 |
2013 | 2,535,000 | 5,627,000 | 4,323,000 | 200,000 | 12,685,000 |
2014 | 2,319,000 | 5,421,000 | 4,459,000 | 186,000 | 12,385,000 |
2015 | 2,107,000 | 5,162,000 | 5,004,000 | 156,000 | 12,429,000 |
2016 | 1,749,000 | 5,238,000 | 4,619,000 | 181,000 | 11,787,000 |
2017 | 1,449,000 | 4,733,000 | 5,093,000 | 140,000 | 11,415,000 |
2018 | 1,570,000 | 4,211,000 | 5,368,000 | 92,000 | 11,241,000 |
2019 | 1,433,000 | 3,766,000 | 5,678,000 | 60,000 | 10,937,000 |
2020 | 1,567,000 | 3,406,000 | 5,588,000 | 93,000 | 10,654,000 |
2021 | 1,589,000 | 2,995,000 | 5,630,000 | 151,000 | 10,365,000 |
2022 | 1,379,000 | 2,772,000 | 5,573,000 | 72,000 | 9,796,000 |
2023 | 1,217,000 | 2,654,000 | 5,644,000 | 96,000 | 9,611,000 |
2024 | 1,119,000 | 2,513,000 | 5,656,000 | 136,000 | 9,424,000 |
Figure 2.2 Table 2: Distribution of memberships by status and year, yearly percentage
Year | A: Open | B: CTNM | C: CTFA | D: Winding up | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | 22% | 51% | 26% | 2% | 100% |
2013 | 20% | 44% | 34% | 2% | 100% |
2014 | 19% | 44% | 36% | 2% | 100% |
2015 | 17% | 42% | 40% | 1% | 100% |
2016 | 15% | 44% | 39% | 2% | 100% |
2017 | 13% | 41% | 45% | 1% | 100% |
2018 | 14% | 37% | 48% | 1% | 100% |
2019 | 13% | 34% | 52% | 1% | 100% |
2020 | 15% | 32% | 52% | 1% | 100% |
2021 | 15% | 29% | 54% | 1% | 100% |
2022 | 14% | 28% | 57% | 1% | 100% |
2023 | 13% | 28% | 59% | 1% | 100% |
2024 | 12% | 27% | 60% | 1% | 100% |
Figure 2.5 Table 1: Memberships by type and year
Year | Active memberships | Deferred memberships | Pensioner memberships |
---|---|---|---|
2012 | 1,980,000 | 6,082,000 | 4,748,000 |
2013 | 1,684,000 | 6,174,000 | 4,827,000 |
2014 | 1,580,000 | 6,006,000 | 4,800,000 |
2015 | 1,511,000 | 6,045,000 | 4,873,000 |
2016 | 1,433,000 | 5,682,000 | 4,672,000 |
2017 | 1,237,000 | 5,575,000 | 4,603,000 |
2018 | 1,157,000 | 5,498,000 | 4,585,000 |
2019 | 1,006,000 | 5,317,000 | 4,588,000 |
2020 | 938,000 | 5,134,000 | 4,583,000 |
2021 | 844,000 | 4,995,000 | 4,526,000 |
2022 | 741,000 | 4,789,000 | 4,267,000 |
2023 | 683,000 | 4,633,000 | 4,295,000 |
2024 | 661,000 | 4,437,000 | 4,325,000 |
Section 3: Technical provisions funding position
Figure 3.5 Table 1: Estimated technical provisions funding figures as at 31 March 2024 by membership group (excludes schemes winding up)
Status | Assets (£bn) | Technical provisions liabilities (£bn) | Surplus (Deficit) (£bn) |
---|---|---|---|
A: 2 to 99 | 13.639 | 11.432 | 2.207 |
B: 100 to 999 | 106.189 | 93.542 | 12.647 |
C: 1,000 to 4,999 | 204.032 | 176.532 | 27.501 |
D: 5,000 to 9,999 | 151.447 | 131.767 | 19.68 |
E: 10,000 + | 752.644 | 627.011 | 125.633 |
Section 4: Public service DB schemes
Figure 4.1 Table 1: Balance of membership types in public service schemes
Membership type | Memberships | Percentage of total |
---|---|---|
Active | 7,395,000 | 38% |
Deferred | 6,142,000 | 32% |
Pensioner | 5,686,000 | 30% |
Total | 19,223,000 | 100% |
Figure 4.2 Table 1: Comparison of balance of membership types – public service and private DB/hybrid
Type | Active | Deferred | Pensioner |
---|---|---|---|
Public service | 7,395,000 | 6,142,000 | 5,686,000 |
Private sector | 661,000 | 4,437,000 | 4,325,000 |
Total | 8,056,000 | 10,579,000 | 10,011,000 |